» »

Reviews for Buick Regal years:

  1. (0)
  2. (1)
  3. (1)
  4. (1)
  5. (1)
  6. (5)
  7. (5)
  8. (1)
  9. (1)
  10. (4)
  11. (6)
  12. (4)
  13. (1)
  14. (5)
  15. (0)
  16. (1)
  17. (0)
  18. (0)
  19. (0)

Owners' Reviews

1995 Buick Regal Reviews and Owner Comments

 
1995 Buick Regal
5 Reviews
Write Your Review
Overall Score (5 reviews)
  • Body, Interior & Misc.
  • Engine
  • Brakes
  • Exhaust & Emissions
  • Drive Train
  • Heating & Air Conditioning
  • Electrical & Lights
  • Suspension & Steering
1995 Buick Regal Owner Reviews (5 reviews)
  • 1995 Buick Regal
    Visitor, Greenbelt, MD, January 29, 2014 20:56
    I like the smooth running of the engine and the confortable interior.It is a nice car, but has bad electrical system an lighting, back brake lights keep burning up, also signal lights went bad. Now the intake manifold is leaking at 142,500 miles.
    Flag This
  • 1995 Buick Regal
    Visitor, Lauderdale, MS, December 26, 2011 20:12
    worse car i have ever owned replaced the transmisson at 96000 miles then the engine ran hot now it needs a a computer and a new engine it only has 126000 miles on it i will never buy a buick again
    Flag This
  • 1995 Buick Regal
    himileage, Livonia, MI, June 01, 2010 06:45
     Rookie
    About to hit 260,000 miles on this car. Great car. Lots of trouble with rear brakes though. Must replace frequently
    Flag This
  • 1995 Buick Regal
    durenevb, Spokane, WA, December 20, 2009 21:51
     Enthusiast
    First time for the 1995 Buick Regal, and I love the car, it is a smooth ride and had now problems with it until now. A commom problem that was on recall last year. The intake manifold gasket went bad and is costly to replace, but I still love the car.
    Flag This
  • 1995 Buick Regal
    StealthyOne, Cincinnati, OH, October 15, 2009 10:50
     Enthusiast
    I own the 3.8 L, which has good power and great breaking, suspension and road handling. The big problem with this car is that the alternator is not powerful enough for everything electrical in the car (mine's loaded), so it fails every 18 - 24 months. Car's compact, sleek profile makes for cramped engine compartment, so the usual problem with most cars of access for maintenance is not on the light side of averages here, and headroom is inadequate for a person over 6'1" tall, but seats are comfortable, for long trips too, even if lower back problems abound. Fuel economy is NOT at or above the revised 19 overall, more like 17. I get 18-19 on trips, cruising at 75, about 14-15 city. Got screwed out of the Clunkers deal by the wrong number assigned for this car's 19 overall mpg.
    Flag This
Ask a Question